What you want is in the blood, Senators ([info]demonista) wrote,
@ 2007-04-15 01:37:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood: shup and shuzzly
Current music:Manics
Entry tags:pornography, prostitution, rad fem, sadopatriarchy

Women's studies essay # 3
I busted my hump many times writing this, so y'all better appreciate it. I'll post it in two or three parts because it's so long (8 pages--excluding the over 3 page bibliography).

Linked Oppressions: Violence Against Women, Prostitution, and Sadopatriarchy

Winnie Small

 

       Many, such as pro-sex feminists keep on saying that women now have the world at their feet. After all, teenage pregnancy is rampant, 18 year old girls are getting breast implants, most women in prostitution began before 16, stripping is proclaimed as liberation, pornography is kind of corny, but it turns people on, and playing daddy-daughter or master-slave is just so subversive.

       Rarely is rape identified as a hate crime. Governments are too busy reading Playboy and listening to the so-called sex industry profiteers to see prostitution as a violation of human rights. (Sweden being a very rare exception.) The Left and Right are only too happy to go along with viewing prostitution through the pimps and consumers perspective. After all, being called a cunt, pimped out, raped, used as an orifice for men to masturbate into is liberating, the penultimate in freedom of choice—practically always as long as its not happening to the one extolling it.

       Violence against women is all too common in society. I don't think that any feminists worth their salt would dispute that, although some who claim to be feminists do just that, such as Camille Paglia and Wendy McElroy (Levy, 2006; McElroy, 2002; McElroy, 2005). Diana Russell (1982; 1999) found that about 1 in 3 girls are abused sexually by the age of 18, 1 in 6 incestuously so, 14% of ever-married women had been raped and 21% had been beaten by their husbands, and over 4 in 10 women had been raped or attempted raped as adults.  The study was originally conducted in the late 1970s on over 900 San Franciscan women, but is still regarded as one of the best studies of its kind to date.

       According to Statistics Canada, in 2004, only a third of physical spousal assaults and less than 10% of sexual assaults are reported to police. Although it decreased by 1% from 1999, 7% of women had been physically or sexually abused by their spouse in the five years previous to the survey. Also, 1 in 5 had been assaulted by an ex-partner in the five year period. Sixteen per cent of women had ever been sexually assaulted by their spouse. Other categories of violence that were particularly high included: choked (19%), beat (19%), hit with an object (23%), and pushed, grabbed or shoved (81%). More “minor” kinds of violence, such as slapping, throwing objects, and biting were actually higher for men than women, probably due to the lesser severity of the acts (Johnson, 2006).

       I think that the most important issue facing feminism is violence against women. This is not to deny that groups of males cannot be profoundly vulnerable to violence, such as gay men, boys, and men of colour. This essay will focus on violence in the forms of prostitution, pornography, and sadomasochism because I think that through an exploration of these, one can find the roots of violence against women. In arguing this, I’m not saying that violence against women is a recent phenomenon. I’m saying that prostitution and sadism have existed for millennia. For example, pornography is not a phenomenon of the twentieth century—for example, ancient Greece had “art” depicting gang rape of prostitutes, sexual abuse of boys, and so forth (Clarke, in Reti, 1993; Dworkin, 1981; Jeffreys, 1997). This also raises a contentious question: what constitutes violence against women? As a radical feminist, I include the ejaculation industry (Morita, in Stark and Whisnant, 2004), also known as the sex industry, as being part of it. This includes prostitution in all its forms, including pornography, stripping, escort services, and, in ways, women who are in relationships with men for economic security, as well as sadopatriarchy, generally known as BDSM (bondage, domination-submission, sadomasochism).

   

    As with other forms of prostitution, pornography is racist, capitalist, misogynist and, most obviously, phallocentric. In photograph after movie after erotic story after photograph, women, and sometimes children and men, are, above all else, penetrated. Vaginally, anally, and orally. By penises, fists, dildoes, bottles, dogs, horses, phones, and guns. Pornography represents above all else that what women exist for is to be invaded in every orifice by whatever the consumer wants to see her “pounded” with, especially his penis (e.g. Bright, 1999; Craft, 2005; Kendall, 2004; Stark and Whisnant, 2004; Stoltenberg, 1989; Stoltenberg, 1994).

       To test this, I went onto The Stag Shop’s website, which as a Canadian store, is under the Butler ruling that pornography can be deemed obscene and censored if it shows significant violence towards and objectification of women. The Stag Shop claims to be “enhancing sex-positive attitudes & sexual well-being.” It provides a representative showing of pornography which is generally considered “non-violent.” The DVD section is divided by type, including “virtual sex” with various “porn stars” and production company, and genre. The genre section is divided into: anal (intercourse, women recipients); bi (only women portrayed as bisexual); black (some references to “big black dicks” and a focus on Latina women); celebrity (such as Jenna Jameson, a woman who, despite arguing she is “liberated,” like so many others in pornography reports rape, poverty, drug addiction, etc. as well not being able to watch her own sex scenes (Levy, 2006)); classics (mainly 1970s, includes Deep Throat, a film in which the “star” was beaten, forced at gunpoint, and raped to make (Lovelace, 1980; Lovelace, 1986; MacKinnon and Dworkin, 1998)); couples (some of which try to be “woman-friendly;” most don’t bother); fetish; gay (most of which focus on sadopatriarchy and hypermasculinity); gonzo (no plot, focusing on double penetrations, ejaculating on women’s faces, seeing who can degrade women the most, etc.). Fetish is categorized into bondage, cream pie, cum swap, double penetration (simultaneous penile anal and vaginal penetration), fisting, gang bang, gape, leather, legs and feet, milfs, female ejaculation, strap ons (mostly “lesbian,” the two films about women penetrating men with strap ons describe the women as “dangerous bitches” who will usurp men, so watch out), and women swallowing ejaculate. The rest are instructional, interracial, “lesbian,” oral (fellatio only), she male, and teen. I went through these as well, but feel that to describe them as well would be superfluous. Throughout, women are described as “nasty new sluts,” “cock hungry whores,” bitches, “her ass is craving destruction,” “cum buckets,” “teen jizz junkies” and so on (The Stag Shop, 2006).

       It’s obvious to me what pornography is about: the dehumanization and harm of women. Pornography also documents prostitution, and these documents will follow the women in them the rest of their lives. Many women who have left pornography and other forms of prostitution have spoken about this (e.g. Dworkin, 1997; Lords, 2004; MacKinnon and Dworkin, 1998; Lovelace, 1986; One Angry Girl, 2007; Simonton and Smith, in Stark and Whisnant, 2004). Pornography is a form of prostitution—women are receiving payment for being recorded having “sex.”
        Wendy McElroy (2002) is able to call anti-prostitution feminists anti-prostitute and somehow believe it, which is similar to considering someone against child sexual abuse as anti-child, but when love means war… “Pro-sex feminists” feel free to deride radical feminists—including radical feminists who are currently or formerly prostituted (as well as ex-masochists and sadists)—for being “sex-negative” (to be accurate, sex-critical). They also discount the studies done on the trauma histories on those in prostitution (e.g. Bright, 2000; McElroy, 2002; McElroy, 2005).

       Studies have been done on those in street, escort, stripping, pornography, and brothel prostitution. Alarming statistics include: most enter prostitution before 16, between 55-90% were sexually abused as children prior to entry into prostitution, about 80% are currently or formerly homeless, between 62 and 85% have been raped while in prostitution, 75% of women in escort prostitution have attempted suicide, 67% had post-traumatic stress disorder, 75-90% is pimp-controlled, about half not in pornography have still had pornography made of them, over 90% of their views on prostitution are negative, as many as a third of prostituted people are Native. Over 90% of those in prostitution want to get out of it (e.g. Dworkin, 1997; Farley, 2003; Farley, 2007; Jeffreys, 1997; Jeffreys, 2003; Kendall, 2004; Lau, 1989; Lords, 2004; MacKinnon and Dworkin, 1998; One Angry Girl, 2007; Stark and Whisnant, 2004). One study on women in strip clubs found that 100% had experienced all of the following: physical abuse, sexual abuse, verbal harassment, and being propositioned for “prostitution” as commonly understood (i.e. for oral, vaginal, or anal intercourse) (Holsopple, 1999, in One Angry Girl, 2007).




(16 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]inbizarre
2007-04-15 05:39 pm UTC (link)
Amazing, once again. Something I would really like to see is a thorough essay on how women are inculcated into sadopatriarchy, basically developing Stockholm Syndrome.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]inbizarre
2007-04-18 04:06 pm UTC (link)
P.S. I have invited you to the comm [info]radicaldamnit for radical Feminists. You can go accept/decline it at Communities>Manage Your Invites.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]demonista
2007-04-18 10:41 pm UTC (link)
Thanks! I've joined it.

I've mentioned Stockholm Syndrome in essays and in some rants, but never written one focusing on it. Have you read Dee Graham's Loving to Survive? I've only heard of it--really need to read it. But it is all about how women have societal Stockholm Syndrome--how all women are raised in a culture of fear, are subjected to violence, bond with their oppressors, etc.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]madderred
2007-04-16 12:32 am UTC (link)
I love how you started this essay out--the 1st 2 paragraphs being sarcastic about the "liberation" of women.
I love it, not to say the rest isnt good, I just havent had a chance to read the whole thing.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]demonista
2007-04-18 10:43 pm UTC (link)
Thanks!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]dis_senter
2007-04-17 06:09 am UTC (link)
I think another huge problem besides the prevalent attitude that prostitution, pornography etc. is liberating, is just the complete whitewashing and erasure of violence against women when it does happen.

Recently here in the news, yet another footballer was accused of raping a woman (which I've no doubt happened). In the news report, not only did the news reporter say this was an 'alleged' rape, which is basically the same as saying he didn't do it, but the rape wasn't even called a rape. Instead, he 'allegedly' 'had sexual intercourse with a woman without her consent.' So even when a man does rape a woman, even when, by some miracle, it is actually deemed important enough to be mentioned in the mainstreamed news, that nasty rape terminology that those damned feminists are always bandying about conveniently disappears...

Anyway, just having a private gripe. I liked your essay. :)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]demonista
2007-04-18 10:47 pm UTC (link)
Thanks.

But it is empowering! Women are reclaiming those words. Being called a cock-hungry whore or hot little gash is so empowering! Blah blah blah

Haha! I also like how they say if a penis wasn't inserted into a vagina, then it wasn't rape, but indecent assault or sexual misconduct.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]_allecto_
2007-04-17 09:55 am UTC (link)
awesome essay. just what I needed to read tonight. thank you. :)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]demonista
2007-04-18 10:47 pm UTC (link)
Why, thank you kindly.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]nouveau_prole
2007-04-19 06:50 pm UTC (link)
Nice one Ms Dem
Shine on brightly

(Reply to this)


[info]kali_ma
2007-04-30 08:11 pm UTC (link)
Heh heh... can you email me? Listed on my profile (for friends view only :) )

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]demonista
2007-04-30 11:34 pm UTC (link)
i just did!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]nesciam
2007-10-21 11:31 pm UTC (link)
You sent me a link to this essay in reaction to a comment I made on [info]captainvanille's journal. From your essay I judge that you are also alarmed by the violent trends of mainstream pornography. This is alarming, I agree absolutely, but at the same time has little to do with sadomasochists living their paraphilia freely.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]vegansendtortur
2009-03-24 06:01 am UTC (link)
hi there nesciam. you have the right to your opinions on bdsm, of course, but if you want to consider some different perspectives, you may be interested in reading a critique of it on a facebook group i made called "sex-positive leftists critical of bdsm".

here's the link to the group: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=19997590461&ref=ts#/group.php?gid=64053174528&ref=ts

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]vegansendtortur
2009-03-18 08:03 am UTC (link)
so far so awesome. about to read parts 2+3. gotta be up to get ready for school in 4 and 1/2 hours. but although i'll be tired, this is rejuvinating to my soul :)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]demonista
2009-03-18 08:06 am UTC (link)
you're reading a ways back :P thx so much! hahaha i'm up way past my bedtime too, as i have been frequently of late. i've class in 6 hours... i'm glad you find it rejuvenating :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(16 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…